Lowell High
Livin' High on the Bungalow

The Rest of the Carmen Chu Story

Peter Fatooh
Peter Fatooh

In 2006, Carmen Chu and her husband purchased their home, located at 2424 Ulloa St. in San Francisco. The purchase price was $800,000.

By 2008, that property would have had a "factored-up" taxable value of $832,320 (county assessor's can raise each year's assessment from purchase date up to 2% based on the provisions of the old Prop 13 — Jarvis-Gann — which passed statewide back in 1978 and became an amendment to our State constitution).

Assessor Carmen Chu
Assessor Carmen Chu

During the 2009 property tax year, the taxable value of 2424 Ulloa St. was $848,964. While a member of the Board of Supervisors, Chu contacted then-Assessor Phil Ting who was appointed to the position by then-Mayor Gavin Newsom. Without filing an appeal of her property taxes, she obtained a reduction to her 2009 taxable value when Ting, in collusion with his appointed Chief Appraiser, Matthew Thomas, unilaterally lowered the 2009 value of Chu's home to $770,000. By performing the latter, Chu was then entitled to a refund of her property taxes of approximately $1,000.00. This process was repeated again in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 by Chu, Ting and Thomas.  2010:  from $825,000 to $770,000;  2011:  from $853,326 to $720,000;  2012:  from $870,390 to $710,000. In February, 2013, Chu was appointed Assessor by the late Mayor, Ed Lee. The 2013-14 property tax role was prepared prior to Chu taking office, but, again, her Ulloa St. home was lowered by Ting, et al from $887,796 to $750,000. Think of it in practical terms: After owning their home for 7 years (2006-2013) the Assessor and Mr. and Ms. Chu were claiming that this very nice Parkside district home of 3 bedrooms and one bath was worth $50,000 LESS than when they purchased it in April of 2006!

quote marks

All of these reductions in value for her personal benefit were arranged while appeals for reductions before the Assessment Appeals Board from regular mom and pop homeowners in the Sunset, Richmond, Mission, Excelsior districts, et al, were vehemently opposed by the Assessor’s Office.”

While the Assessor, herself, Chu then lowered it even again. She unilaterally lowered it from $891,826 to $850,000! No appeal ever filed at the Assessment Appeals Board for any of the 6 years of lowered value. Chu made no effort to publicly notice her own reductions.

The 2014 reduction is even more egregious. As Assessor, Chu used employees in her office to "determine" the reduced value of her home. Clearly a conflict of interest and a misuse of city employees. Chu even promoted the person who "appraised" her home for the 2014 tax year.

Not a single public file exists to review the Assessor's office's records of these reductions. When reductions in value are made for multiple years on a property, Assessors document their value with interior photos of the subject property. No interior photos for 2424 Ulloa St.

All of these reductions in value for her personal benefit were arranged while appeals for reductions before the Assessment Appeals Board from regular mom and pop homeowners in the Sunset, Richmond, Mission, Excelsior districts, et al, were vehemently opposed by the Assessor’s Office.

That's the rest of the story as Paul Harvey used to say!

Peter Fatooh was a member of the SF Assessment Appeals Board for 27 years and is currently President of SF Property Tax Appeals.

February 2021



vaccination

City's Shameful Healthcare Gap

Exile for SF's Subacute Skilled Nursing Patients — Continues

His parents are afraid that if they are not able to visit Ken to oversee his care and emotional health, he will deteriorate again and potentially die. He is very vulnerable.

Check it out

West Portal Awakens from COVID

People on the street

Westside folk are beginning to emerge ... as inside dining and browsing are available, customers are, once again, on sidewalks.

Check it out

City College Protest

Can We Save City College?

Former Chancellor Mark Rocha cut nearly a thousand classes at the same time he proposed hefty pay raises for the school’s administrators ... the current administration insists on following the same misguided course.

Check it out

Electricity Cartoon

What's behind PG&E's Time Of Use Pricing?

Rate Increase Disguised in Cuddly Sheep’s Garb

The promise of TOU metering is that the customer can adjust their usage to use electric devices when the cost is lower, during the day. That’s not really possible. For those working households ....

Check it out

Slush-funds via ‘pay-to-play’ contract bidding

SFPUC's Community Benefits Secrets

Redacted document

After Mar sent a Letter of Inquiry... the just-released, heavily-redacted copy has folks wondering what’s being concealed?

Check it out

Utility
Bill Shock

The Future & Unlimited Rates

Rates Up, Up and Away!

It will take a few years for SF to deplete its stored water, but rationing could begin early to prevent worse later.

Read More ...

© 2020 Westside San Francisco Media. No portion of the articles or artwork may be republished without expressed consent. Legal disclaimer.