spacer

Your Donations Count Donate Graphicat the Westside Observer!

evicted

Protecting All Renters is Pro-Housing Policy

Tenants response to Martin-Pinto’s Article

Editor’s Note: Opinions expressed by contributors to the Westside Observer are the author’s point of view. They do not reflect the position of WSO. As always, we welcome opposing commentary submissions.

• • • • • • • • • •December 2024 • • • • • • • • • •

In 1979, facing an unprecedented housing affordability and eviction crisis, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors enacted rent control and eviction protections for hundreds of thousands of renters across San Francisco.

San Francisco was not a radical outlier for passing rent control. From 1973-77 the federal government enacted rent restrictions in Alaska during the construction of an oil pipeline due to the surge of new workers to the region.These workers were experiencing extreme “rent gouging” by the landlords who happened to be in the right place at the right time. The Fed responded to the question: why should a landlord reap tremendous windfall profits from inflated prices due to a housing shortage?

quote marks

In light of the responsibilities local governments have to provide essential infrastructure and services, it is imperative that they also regulate housing markets. Tenants comprise 64 percent of San Francisco’s population; it is not unreasonable to craft laws to protect them from extreme rent increases and unfair evictions. ”

Some property owners argue that rent control is a form of government overreach. However, their own property values rely on a large and beneficial system of government support, from infrastructure, transit, street beautification, and police security. The very notion of “owning” the deed to a parcel of land and the ability of excluding others from that property would be impossible without the US government decreeing it as a right.

 In light of the responsibilities local governments have to provide essential infrastructure and services, it is imperative that they also regulate housing markets. Tenants comprise 64 percent of San Francisco’s population; it is not unreasonable to craft laws to protect them from extreme rent increases and unfair evictions. Homeowners benefit from their own “price controls” through long-term fixed-rate mortgages and Prop 13’s cap on property taxes. 

Such policies are vital for maintaining community stability, ensuring that housing remains accessible and affordable for all residents. By actively regulating housing, local governments can thwart exploitative practices that lead to gentrification and displacement, thereby fostering a thriving community for everyone. Rent control offers a comparable level of housing stability to those unable to afford a down payment. State and federal courts have consistently ruled for the past hundred years that rent controls are valid regulations serving legitimate public policy goals. Under current laws, landlords are still guaranteed a “fair and adequate return” and can reset rents when a tenant moves out.

The opponents to expanding rent control, such as the YIMBYSs, present a false choice between housing stability and the viability of new housing construction. According to the Haas Institute, three bay area cities with rent control (San Francisco, San Jose, and Oakland) have 27 percent of the region’s housing, but built 43 percent of the new multi-unit rental units since 2000. The bogeyman of rent control has not curbed production in these cities.

In 2016, the Urban Displacement Project (UC Berkeley and UCLA) studied the theory that just building more housing will eventually create more affordable rental units, and found that there is no evidence to support this claim. Rent control is an important policy protecting poor and working-class renters, and building more market rate housing will not help these families if it is unaffordable for people working minimum wage or other critical low wage jobs.  Markets do not respond to poverty, and thus relying solely on free markets to provide affordable housing is misguided at best.

Jennifer Fieber is a member of the SF Tenants Union.

December 2024

Have Your Say

More Trending Articles



Tumlin on his bike

Tumlin resigned from his $400,725 annual salary + benefits

Jeffrey Tumlin: The Real Story

by George Wooding

SFMTA reports inflation and the end of emergency funding will leave a $260-million to $322-million deficit beginning in 2026...

Read More

SF Botanical Gardens

Betrayal in Golden Gate Park

by Harry Pariser

For decades, Strybing served as a gathering place for one and all, hosting people from all walks of life and every economic strata. What could possibly go wrong?

Check it out

Unvailing

Sorry Melania...

by Carol Kocivar

With a sincere sense of regret, I declined the invitation to sit next to Melania at the presidential inauguration.

Read More

Designing for Fire & Wind Safety

surviving home

Lessons from LA

by Glenn Rogers

The common belief is that homes are too close to woodlands, where fires catch on easily. However, one home in Pacific Palisades contradicts that notion..

Check it out

senior waiting

Laguna Honda: Finish the Job
—Open the Doors.

Health Commission?

by Dr. Teresa Palmer

Why are ALL types of admissions so slow? As of the end of November, less than 430 of the 769 licensed nursing home beds at LHH were occupied.

Read More

Mayor London Breed

Breed Expands Drug Tourism

by Randy Shaw / Beyond Chron

People unable to afford rent come to San Francisco and wait until a city-funded outreach worker offers them an unlimited stay in a tourist hotel with a private bathroom. Plus two meals a day.

Check it out