spacer
Donate Image

Your Donations Count Donate Graphicat the Westside Observer!

High-Speed Train
Billions and billions later, high-speed trains connecting SF and LA are still not guaranteed

Mea-Culpa: California's Elusive High-Speed Rail System

•••••••••• April 2023 ••••••••••

In a December 6, 1962 speech in New York City, then Assistant Secretary of Defense stated: “I think the inherent right of the Government to lie to save itself when faced with nuclear disaster -- is basic.” The California High Speed Rail Authority’s Northern California Regional Director Boris Lipkin in the San Mateo Daily Journal’s November 17, 2022 edition applied such falsity doctrine to that failed project. (I have publicly pleaded guilty of creating such state body with 1996 legislation as a then state senator.)

quotes

The project cost for the non-high speed rail portion in the Central Valley increased last month to $35.3 billion from $25.2 billion. It obtains money from a cap-and-trade program which adds 23 cents to every gasoline gallon besides the state’s 53.9 cents tax per gallon.”

Critics have charged that California’s once highly-publicized electrified high-speed rail project is now a chimera or, worse, a tax-eating boondoggle. A November 17, 2022 letter to the editor from the California High Speed Rail Authority’s Northern California Regional Director in The Daily Journal denying such failure reminded of a wry witticism: “Exaggeration is a blood relative to falsehood and almost as bad.” This high-speed flack, paid with taxpayer dollars, accused me (whose legislative authorship created the Authority and enabled his subsequent flackery appointment) of “factually inaccurate statement . . .”. Instead, he declared that 119 miles of high-speed track are honestly “already under construction . . .”. Yet after I requested, pursuant to the California Public Records Act: “All current contracts now in effect for construction of track from Merced to Bakersfield and Coachella and Wasco” the Authority’s Public Records Administrator informed me last January that “. . . the Authority . . . has no records responsive to this request.” That means no construction contract has been let!

The Authority hasn’t even acquired by eminent domain or owner agreement all land parcels needed for project construction. At the end of January, the Authority’s honest Public Records Administrator stated that total parcels delivered were 2,167 “compared to an estimated 2,305 parcels needed.” Environmental clearance for the promised San Francisco to San Jose, San Jose to Merced, Merced to Fresno, Fresno to Bakersfield, Bakersfield to Palmdale, and Palmdale to Los Angeles segments have been obtained, but there’s no funding to build. (Did I hear “idle gesture”?)

Of total authorized Authority positions (429), 328 are filled. The remainder are vacant. The legislature last year finally allowed sale of the remaining $4,200,000,000 general obligation bonds authorized by taxpaying voters in the November, 2008 election, but the Public Records Administrator advises that no records of private investment in the project from 2009 until 2022 exist. The Authority admits the project will cost $77,000,000,000 - $113,000,000,000. Where’s the money for even a diesel system duplicating Amtrak service in the Central Valley, much less true high-speed electrified trains? That’s right: the 119 miles from Merced to Bakersfield will accommodate only diesel trains, not electrified.

Fresno Station
Amenities for Frassno Station site include safe and well-traveled spaces for food vendors, bicycle repair stations and parking, shade structures for visitors, Wi-Fi access, public art installations, blue light emergency phone towers and sufficient lighting to ease safety concerns.

The project cost for the non-high speed rail portion in the Central Valley increased last month to $35,300,000,000 from $25,200,000,000. It obtains money from a cap-and-trade program which adds 23 cents to every gasoline gallon besides the state’s 53.9 cents tax per gallon. Moreover, President Biden’s Department of Transportation denied last month a $1,300,000,000 requested grant for the project, deeming it not “cost effective.” (The only construction to date consists of bridges and viaducts which State Senator Brian Jones of San Diego asserts should in the Central Valley should be demolished if they can’t “repurposed.”)

The remaining project mavens seem to have a reverence for the truth. They always keep a respectable distance from it!

Finally, the Authority claims “. . . the project will not run diesel trains . . .” and is “already electrifying the Caltrain corridor . . .” The 2008 $9,950,000,000 state bond issue included $950,000,000 to connect regional train systems like Capitol Corridor, Caltrain and Metrolink (in the L.A. Basin) to high-speed rail. The Authority instead is spending $775,000,000 in bond proceeds to electrify Caltrain. Caltrain constitutes regional rail service of about 45 miles limited to one set of tracks, not the needed two if true high-speed trains ever operate on the Peninsula and doesn’t under state law need to pay all operating expenses from farebox revenue; High-Speed Rail does, per the voter-approved 2008 bond issue. It’s impossible for it to do so in the Central Valley competing against Amtrak in small cities. It’s not building tracks from San Francisco to Los Angeles as promised voters in 2008. It’s building a diesel train system (actually only from Coachella to Wasco in Kern County). As the Authority claims, “electrified rail” is in California statutes, but neither Caltrain nor Metrolink is required by state law to be electrified. High-speed electrified rail’s California future doesn’t now exist, the 2008 ballot vision stained by subsequent misleading of California voters under post-2008 leadership which manifestly can’t contradict facts. Close the project and convey remaining bond proceeds equally to Caltrain and Metrolink with statewide voter approval.

Quentin Kopp is a former San Francisco supervisor, state senator, SF Ethics Commission member and retired Superior Court judge who was president of the California High Speed Rail Authority governing board, 2006-2008..

April 2023


Have Your Say

More Trending Articles



West Portal Station

Nightmare Plan from Melgar, Breed, and Tumlin

Showdown on West Portal

by George Wooding

SFMTA still has no quantifiable road safety data other than right turns are bad, left turns are bad, fast-moving cars are dangerous, slow-moving cars are dangerous, cars are bad, and bikes are good.

Read More

Laguna Honda Costs graphic

So What’s the Damage?

Counting the Costs of the Laguna Honda Debacle

by Patrick Monette-Shaw

Sadly, LHH has not been recertified, patient admissions have not restarted. So patients needing skilled nursing care are displaced out-of-county.

Check it out

West Portal graphic

Addressing the West Portal Tragedy

Planning for a Safe Intersection

by Supervisor Myrna Melgar

The winning projects will be most closely align to the criteria and can be successfully completed with the funding allocated as a one-time grant.

Read More ...

Removing density controls in western and central SF?

Redevelopment

Mayor’s Upzoning Plan Endangers Our Neighborhoods

by Dennis Antenore

Demolitions, speculations, and displacement are in store if the city moves forward with Breed’s approach.

Check it out

Homeless seek respite at Ocean Beach

homeless at Ocean Beach

Life at the end of the safety net

by David Romano

If you do get into a shelter — they’ll take away your belongings, you can’t have a pet, you can’t have visitors and after a few days or a week, you’ll likely be turned out on the street again with nothing.

Check it out

Pill popping

Overdose Deaths Bewilder DPH

Battling lethal drug combinations

by Dr. Derek Kerr

The devastating effect of drug addiction is evident from the human wreckage ...Yes, it’s a nationwide plague. But SF overdose rates are twice the national average.

Check it out

© 2023 Westside San Francisco Media. No portion of the articles or artwork may be republished without expressed consent. Legal disclaimer.